-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/13 3:33 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Yann Leboulanger > <[email protected]> wrote: >> While starting to implement XEP-0191, I realized that there is a >> regression in the feature Gajim offers if I don't use privacy >> lists: The ability to block a group by its name. > > Yann - I've been thinking about this, and I don't entirely > understand what the use case is here - in what situation would you > want to add a load of people to your roster, put them all in the > same group, but then block them?
Even if there is a use case, XEP-0191 was not designed to solve it. By design, that spec serves one purpose only: block a single JID. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRWKqtAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pF8UP/27hd8Ozf/WJBJlpWeRuWMGI 4e8DSrc5XcEJeEOaxyEmqYY7Glb34gj56LHOSCrdw9FcEiW4w85evvzT7Upe9Kkf lvJujoAS2un0hoaHfCMDW7s6pSuZX+T6jEGjP74AYIUtEHeeNWdBP36R/8MsIVtO c9huJUU1gJkcuDbFpgF1rI0GlOxPXoV9lw3oh+VL0JTIBgKAaG4upjm8iMEkUJEl dQd2chaf5KPhOnndES6ltQW3smuu9qOYo72wwJWbnHWF1rJG6Ve51r3hbQRHoidp i2ej7qi++egtJZ0NoC0mRe/vQz57Owlw2aYtS/2JWgOBsPmeq89H09CklDbS307g lOiveQefgdm5zth9KIBN7nFP4Y4d+QHpMu1JDLA3Jk9dYueNofzjGfWt5H0pWzLP cLUMl62sVxvr+hOOBghRSYYgHQTYZha02ggQf9wRzTVWseuJhtgD1HCzd02Qo0XM C6/H01m1qXvRkUsi+zG2bRq1f4O9Unxvq5oXOw09PQt8yr92YkljlQd7w9a6ulhB vhoFPlVHLd+dYyxwuFqcOKXGcPoMSGMCirE5faR9bXoFMosKMO6VgVKSvn0CCkFi LDX4Q9RTzPxff+5iOVBLX3k+Ssm8lB4TGPkd6MoKhwXKliihdpn1vSKdK4oSZ6Af fhhnF4qoBv0NVHyR50U2 =STgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
