On 2 Apr 2013 10:56, "Will Thompson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't really see what this buys over PSA's suggestion of Gajim implementing "block this whole group" with "foreach user in group: block user", except more complexity which XEP-0191 (as I understand it) was explicitly designed to reduce.
I did say possibly. I reserve the right to change my mind. But if you want to use roster groups as first-class items, then they need to have jids, and you go from there. If you're happy to move the complexity client-side, then that's fine. > If you get into blocking roster groups, you have to consider what happens if you unblock a JID which is inside a blocked group; how you represent to the user that moving a user out of a group they've blocked might (?) unblock them; etc. UI considerations. :-) Dave.
