On 03/31/2013 11:29 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 3/31/13 3:33 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Yann Leboulanger
<[email protected]> wrote:
While starting to implement XEP-0191, I realized that there is a
regression in the feature Gajim offers if I don't use privacy
lists: The ability to block a group by its name.
Yann - I've been thinking about this, and I don't entirely
understand what the use case is here - in what situation would you
want to add a load of people to your roster, put them all in the
same group, but then block them?
Even if there is a use case, XEP-0191 was not designed to solve it. By
design, that spec serves one purpose only: block a single JID.
Ok then I think the best thing is to use it as a fallback method if
Server doesn't support Privacy Lists as it removes a feature we use with
privacy lists.
--
Yann
