On Thu, Aug 31, 2017, at 08:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I realize people voiced a concern with not being able to develop to the > spec right away. That's why it's 0.1. Coders aren't stupid, they realize > that 0.1 means it's early days. If they run into ambiguities, they'll > provide feedback on the list.
In general I agree with you, but this one felt like half the spec was missing (there were a lot of very important TODOs). That being said, I can't wait to see it developed further, I just think it needs to be flushed out a tiny bit more before we say it's ready for experimental implementations. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
