On Samstag, 13. Januar 2018 09:35:42 CET Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:28:19 +0000 > > Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would almost certainly implement -49, in order to have interop with > > the vast majority of currently deployed stuff, and as a server dev I > > would absolutely certainly implement 49 - probably as one of the > > first things I did. > > I disagree about clients. Conversion between PEP and Private XML is > even easier to implement in servers (than PEP and vCard avatars). And > we need a XEP for it as well, btw :) So, I think this should be a > MUST for modern servers to support all these XEP + conversion, when > clients may only support PEP ones. Note that this approach also > resolves the current situation with clients as long as servers get > updated. IMHO.
Can PEP-only clients somehow obtain avatars in MUCs? If not, we need read-only 153 support in clients and servers no matter what. kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
