On 15 Jan 2018, at 09:31, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 Jan 2018 07:02, "Jonas Wielicki" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Sonntag, 14. Januar 2018 13:53:53 CET Tedd Sterr wrote: > > As someone intending to develop a new modern client, I think a sensible (and > > useful) suggestion would be to add something along the lines of "Legacy > > Considerations." This could be inserted either as an additional row in each > > of the 2.x tables as necessary, or as a new section 2.5. That way 0084 can > > be recommended for new deployments, while acknowledging that 0153 is still > > widely used and advisable if you want any kind of compatibility (but that > > the latter isn't a recommendation in its own right.) > > > > More broadly, this would open a space to mention other XEPs that aren't > > suggested but are still needed in reality for compatibility (e.g. 0049?) > > I think this is a great way forward. Let’s recommend 153 & 49 for now (because > this is just like reality *is* ATM and it will be needed for compat), and do > what Tedd proposed for '19. > > So you're saying "do nothing for now", and "do this for next year”?
I *think* Jonas is saying “Merge Kev’s PR for now” :) /K
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
