On Montag, 15. Januar 2018 09:47:28 CET Kevin Smith wrote: > On 15 Jan 2018, at 09:31, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2018 07:02, "Jonas Wielicki" <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> > > On Sonntag, 14. Januar 2018 13:53:53 CET Tedd Sterr wrote: > > > As someone intending to develop a new modern client, I think a sensible > > > (and useful) suggestion would be to add something along the lines of > > > "Legacy Considerations." This could be inserted either as an additional > > > row in each of the 2.x tables as necessary, or as a new section 2.5. > > > That way 0084 can be recommended for new deployments, while > > > acknowledging that 0153 is still widely used and advisable if you want > > > any kind of compatibility (but that the latter isn't a recommendation > > > in its own right.) > > > > > > More broadly, this would open a space to mention other XEPs that aren't > > > suggested but are still needed in reality for compatibility (e.g. 0049?) > > > > I think this is a great way forward. Let’s recommend 153 & 49 for now > > (because this is just like reality *is* ATM and it will be needed for > > compat), and do what Tedd proposed for '19. > > > > So you're saying "do nothing for now", and "do this for next year”? > > I *think* Jonas is saying “Merge Kev’s PR for now” :)
Pretty much :-).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
