On Sonntag, 14. Januar 2018 13:53:53 CET Tedd Sterr wrote:
> As someone intending to develop a new modern client, I think a sensible (and
> useful) suggestion would be to add something along the lines of "Legacy
> Considerations." This could be inserted either as an additional row in each
> of the 2.x tables as necessary, or as a new section 2.5. That way 0084 can
> be recommended for new deployments, while acknowledging that 0153 is still
> widely used and advisable if you want any kind of compatibility (but that
> the latter isn't a recommendation in its own right.)
> 
> More broadly, this would open a space to mention other XEPs that aren't
> suggested but are still needed in reality for compatibility (e.g. 0049?)

I think this is a great way forward. Let’s recommend 153 & 49 for now (because 
this is just like reality *is* ATM and it will be needed for compat), and do 
what Tedd proposed for '19.

kind regards,
Jonas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to