On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, at 09:02, Tedd Sterr wrote: > As long as it doesn't confuse existing implementations, hopefully > nothing; but I suppose that's what the namespace bump is for.
It sounded to me like this would be a new distinct namespace older-than-previous-message corrections, a namespace bump may be more contentious in a draft XEP. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
