Hi all, Having been prodded into it by people implementing Inbox, I'm doing a sweep over it.
So far, I've removed the two dangling references to the conversation marking scheme we removed at the Summit, which seems uncontroversial. * There is a reference to MAM-FC, which I'll remove on the basis that I don't see any interest in trying to solve that problem generically from anyone but me (and if you want to discuss that, please don't take over this thread!) * There's a brief handwavey mention of RSM, but that requires an ordering. Order by the date on the last message OK to everyone? Most recent first? * There's currently no actual sane way to deal with "traditional MUC". It's almost like the original one was designed without that in mind, isn't it? Any kind of persistent groupchat works fine (and this includes MIX), but transient groupchats like traditional XEP-0045 are plainly confusing. Should we rule those out? * Ignoring the transient MUC problem above, the design appears to work without any need for the server to discover the nature of the remote jid. Is that right? * Holger asked whether an outgoing message should mark everything read. If the sending client doesn't support XEP-0333, that might be sensible. Any other comments? Any answers? Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
