On 7 Oct 2020, at 03:35, Tedd Sterr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > * There is a reference to MAM-FC, which I'll remove on the basis that I
> > don't
> > see any interest in trying to solve that problem generically from anyone
> > but me
>
> General solutions should be preferred where possible, though that can
> sometimes result in more complexity than necessary in an attempt to stay as
> general possible (not to imply this is.)
> Aside from one vocal opposition, is there active disinterest or is it
> 'Silence Is Acceptance' and there simply isn't enough to complain about yet?
MAM-FC is on the list-to-implement-when-the-chance-arises for us.
/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
