* Dave Cridland <[email protected]> [2020-10-06 21:45]: > * There's a brief handwavey mention of RSM, but that requires an ordering. > Order by the date on the last message OK to everyone? Most recent first?
Sounds good to me. (I assumed this to be the intented ordering from the following sentence: "The Inbox consists semantically of a list of conversations in order of last activity." But a clarification definitely makes sense.) > * There's currently no actual sane way to deal with "traditional MUC". It's > almost like the original one was designed without that in mind, isn't it? > Any kind of persistent groupchat works fine (and this includes MIX), but > transient groupchats like traditional XEP-0045 are plainly confusing. There's also no way for the user's server to track unread messages on remote MUCs (persistent or not), as the user's server won't see the groupchat messages if the user is offline, and has no access to the MUC's MAM archive (and therefore the MAM/stanza IDs), right? Holger _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
