On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On the other hand, possibly pushing futures into a concurrent.* > namespace within the standard library means that you could have > concurrent.futures, concurrent.map, concurrent.apply and so on, and > pull the things which multiprocessing does and threading can as well > into that concurrent package. I really like the idea of a concurrent package over adding these things to multiprocessing - I might even be able to get it implemented before CPython since I have some obvious implementation advantages ;)
-Frank _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
