2009/11/7 Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>: > I'm not sure this has anything to do with the discussion about futures > anyway.
It's not - unless the suggestion that futures get added into multiprocessing was serious. Personally, I like the idea of a "concurrent" namespace - concurrent.futures seems like an ideal place for the module. Paul. _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
