2009/11/7 Jesse Noller <jnol...@gmail.com>: > Also, multiprocessing has never been "just" the threading > API on top of processes. Part of the PEP for it's inclusion was that > it had other items in it of value.
I guess it's my fault then for not paying enough attention to the multithreading PEP. I did think it was "just" a multiprocess version of threading, and if I'd have realised, I'd have lobbied for parity of implementation at the time. Ah well, none of that is a criticism of multiprocessing itself, and it's certainly not too late to add this, as you said. Paul. _______________________________________________ stdlib-sig mailing list stdlib-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/stdlib-sig
