Hi, Can you tell specifically what the scenario? (Which Client, BS and OPS?). We tested all the combination and could not find any problem.
Regards, Shankar On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Abu Obeida Bakhach <[email protected] > wrote: > I did a sanity check, and its look great! > However, I couldn't get the WsHttpBinding cases to work. can I still vote > +1 despite that? > > Thanks, > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache > Stonehenge > > M1 release. > > > > Here is my vote +1. > > I tested the following scenarios in Linux, > > PHP_BS -> PHP_OPS > PHP_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC > PHP_BS -> JAVA_OPS > PHP_BS -> JAVA_OPSSEC > JAVA_BS -> PHP_OPS > JAVA_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC > JAVA_BS -> JAVA_OPS > JAVA_BS -> JAVA_OPSSEC > > All the above work without an issue. > > Bye, > > -Chintana > > -- > http://engwar.com/ > > -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
