Has anyone done a Linux/PHP -> Windows/dotnet scenario or the reverse? Is it needed for M1? On one hand it might be required by the mentors/managers however I think we said originally that we wanted (for M1) to meet the level of interoperability demonstrated by MSFT/WSO2 in the original demo.
Thanks! Drew -----Original Message----- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:19 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) Clean install of the binaries.zip worked. Installed DB and ran thru the entire interop guide successfully. +1 from me. Interop guide has: -------------------- .NET Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS PHP Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS .NET Client -> PHP BS -> PHP OPS PHP Client -> WSAS BS -> WSAS OPS PHP Client -> .NET BS -> .NET OPS .NET Client -> PHP BS -> .NET OPS .NET Client -> PHP BS -> WSAS OPSSEC PHP Client -> .NET BS -> WSAS OPSSEC -Ben -----Original Message----- From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 12:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) Hi, I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here: http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/ The key is here: http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/release2/KEYS RAT reports are here: http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/rat_report/release2/ This release is tagged at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge/tags/stonehenge_m1_incubator/ Note: The changes between this and the first take (1) Artifacts are built from tag Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache Stonehenge M1 release. Here is my vote +1. Regards, Shankar -- S.Uthaiyashankar Software Architect WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
