That case actually works now, the doc had a wrong value (see below)
However there are two cases that are not working for me: PHP_BS-> DOTNET_OPSSEC
and DOTNET_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC. Could it be a config issue?
Below are the test cases, their results, and the error log for the last error
Thanks
-----
This is my test matrix:
• PHP_BS -> PHP_OPS
Pass
• PHP_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC
Pass
• PHP_BS -> DOTNET_OPS
Pass
• PHP UI -> PHP_BS -> DOTNET_OPSSEC
○ BTW, I am unable to access
http://localhost:8000/TradeOrderProcessor/sec in the browser
○ I killed OPS, sold my holding in S3. Then as expected, nothing
happened. When I revived OPS, it crashed and the account.php/.aspx both showed
this odd entry:
§ Creation date 5/8/2009
§ Completion date12/31/1969
Clearly there is something wrong
• DOTNET_UI_secure -> DOTNET_BS -> DOTNET_OPSSEC
Pass
• DOTNET_UI -> PHP_BS -> DOTNET_OPSSEC
○ Repeated test, same issue: historic completion date, no processing.
• DOTNET_BS -> DOTNET_OPS
Pass
• DOTNET_BS -> DOTNET_OPSSEC
○ The documentation mistakenly says:ASync_DotNet_Http_Msecurity. It
should be WsHttp
* this was the problem in my first email, this should be
fixed in the doc
• DOTNET_BS -> PHP_OPS
Pass
• DOTNET_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC
○ Error!!
Here us the log for the last error
Server Error in '/Trade' Application.
An unsecured or incorrectly secured fault was received from the other party.
See the inner FaultException for the fault code and detail.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the
current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about
the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details:
System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1[[System.ServiceModel.ExceptionDetail,
System.ServiceModel, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089]]: An unsecured or incorrectly secured fault
was received from the other party. See the inner FaultException for the fault
code and detail.
Source Error:
Line 84: quantity = 0; //Value of 0 indicates to sell
entire holding.
Line 85: if (!badQuantity)
Line 86: order = businessServicesClient.sell(userid,
holdingID, quantity);
Line 87: }
Line 88: else
Source File:
d:\Projects\stonehenge_M1\stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating\dotnet_stocktrader\trader_client\Trade\Order.aspx.cs
Line: 86
Stack Trace:
[FaultException`1: An unsecured or incorrectly secured fault was received from
the other party. See the inner FaultException for the fault code and detail.]
System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage
reqMsg, IMessage retMsg) +10256970
System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData&
msgData, Int32 type) +539
Trade.BusinessServiceContract.ITradeServices.sellEnhanced(String userID,
Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) +0
Trade.StockTraderWebApplicationServiceClient.BusinessServiceClient.sellEnhanced(String
userID, Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) +199
Trade.StockTraderWebApplicationServiceClient.BSLClient.sell(String userID,
Int32 holdingID, Double quantity) +252
Trade.Web.Order.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in
d:\Projects\stonehenge_M1\stonehenge-stocktrader-m1-incubating\dotnet_stocktrader\trader_client\Trade\Order.aspx.cs:86
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o,
Object t, EventArgs e) +25
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender,
EventArgs e) +42
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +132
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +66
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint,
Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +2428
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.3053; ASP.NET
Version:2.0.50727.3053
Pasted from
<http://localhost/Trade/Order.aspx?action=sell&holdingid=100000007&quantity=437>
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 7:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
Hi,
Can you tell specifically what the scenario? (Which Client, BS and OPS?). We
tested all the combination and could not find any problem.
Regards,
Shankar
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Abu Obeida Bakhach <[email protected]
> wrote:
> I did a sanity check, and its look great!
> However, I couldn't get the WsHttpBinding cases to work. can I still vote
> +1 despite that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Please test, review and vote on the release artifacts for Apache
> Stonehenge
> > M1 release.
> >
> > Here is my vote +1.
>
> I tested the following scenarios in Linux,
>
> PHP_BS -> PHP_OPS
> PHP_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC
> PHP_BS -> JAVA_OPS
> PHP_BS -> JAVA_OPSSEC
> JAVA_BS -> PHP_OPS
> JAVA_BS -> PHP_OPSSEC
> JAVA_BS -> JAVA_OPS
> JAVA_BS -> JAVA_OPSSEC
>
> All the above work without an issue.
>
> Bye,
>
> -Chintana
>
> --
> http://engwar.com/
>
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
