Quoting Frank Shields <[email protected]>: 

> Alex, 
>
> It’s the H/C ratio that has been considered.  
>
> I like the term Fixed Carbon’ when we actually measure the carbon content in 
> the left overs.  
>
> Regards 
>
> Frank 
>
> Frank Shields 
>
> Control Laboratories, Inc. 
>
> 42 Hangar Way 
>
> Watsonville, CA  95076 
>
> (831) 724-5422 tel 
>
> (831) 724-3188 fax 
>
> www.biocharlab[1].com 
>
> FROM: Alex English [mailto:[email protected]] 
> SENT: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 3:36 PM
> TO: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
> CC: Frank Shields; 'Crispin Pemberton-Pigott'; [email protected]; 'Hugh 
> McLaughlin'; 'Ron Larson'; 'Thomas Reed'
> SUBJECT: Re: [Stoves] Characteristics of biochar was Re: [biochar] grassifier 
> & cedar chip char  
>
> Perhaps it should be called fixed-up carbon, its whats left after getting rid 
> of the rif-raf that can['t tough it out in the kitchen when thing get hot.
>
> What other tests are there that would give a better representation of the 
> biological recalcitrance of char?
>
> Alex
>
> On 05/02/2013 5:33 PM, Frank Shields wrote:  
>
> Paul, 
>
> My biggest problem with the term ‘fixed carbon’ is that it is not a 
> measurement of the carbon at all. Just the stuff left over after heating that 
> can contain Oxygen and hydrogen.  
>
> Frank  
>
> FROM: Stoves [mailto:[email protected]] ON BEHALF OF 
> Paul Anderson
> SENT: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:17 PM
> TO: Crispin Pemberton-Pigott; Discussion of biomass cooking stoves; 
> [email protected]; Hugh McLaughlin; Ron Larson; Thomas Reed
> SUBJECT: Re: [Stoves] Characteristics of biochar was Re: [biochar] grassifier 
> & cedar chip char  
>
> Crispin,  
>
> The influence of the coal industry on the testing is not a perfect match for 
> what biomass gasification is all about and the testing of biomass and biochar.
>
> Biomass can be 50% carbon, but with decay it will all go to CO2.      Fixed 
> carbon must be created in the carbonization process.
>
> In Atlanta airport about to fly to Uganda for 3 weeks.   I hope that others 
> will comment, and not rely on me to reply.
>
> Paul
>
> Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD" 
>
> Email:  [email protected]   Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072 
>
> Website:  www.drtlud.com[2] 
>
> On 2/5/2013 10:09 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote:   
>
> Dear Paul 
>
> 1. As far as I know, there is no "fixed carbon" in the biomass.   It is fixed 
> during the process of carbonization/pyrolysis.
>
> That is the problem – it you give a sample of wood to a lab and they perform 
> a ‘coal analysis test’ on it you will get a report on the amount of ‘fixed 
> carbon’. The point I was making is that it is a metric of convenience arising 
> from the test procedure, not a reference to a material property. 
>
> 2.  Some biomass such as seeds have "oils" that vaporize or are volatile.   
> They are generally not pyrolyzed.   However, the lignin and other "stuff" in 
> biomass is what is pyrolyzed and gives off pyrolytic gases that are volatile. 
>   At low temperatures, the future volatiles are not yet in a form that can be 
> called volatile.   But they will volatize when subjected to higher 
> temperatures.
>
> I will accept what the chemist eventually clarify for us.
>
> The % Volatiles are defined as that fraction that will boil (literally) at a 
> given temperature. Choose you temperature. So when using a defined method, 
> the result changes with the temperature your use. 
>
> See for example http://www.sigmatest.org/Coal-Testing-India.html 
>
> “PROXIMATE ANALYSIS - MOISTURE, VOLATILE MATTER, ASH AND FIXED CARBON:  
>
> “Proximate analysis indicates the percentage by weight of the Fixed Carbon, 
> Volatiles, Ash, and Moisture Content in coal. The amounts of fixed carbon and 
> volatile combustible matter directly contribute to the heating value of coal. 
> Fixed carbon acts as a main heat generator during burning. High volatile 
> matter content indicates easy ignition of fuel. The ash content is important 
> in the design of the furnace grate, combustion volume, pollution control 
> equipment and ash handling systems of a furnace.” 
>
> This week we tried to get some tests of fuel content and were offered ‘coal 
> analysis’ tests. It all sounds good but if you look into the procedure, you 
> are not getting what you think – i.e. it is not an analysis of the elements 
> that we are used to talking about in the biomass fuel biz. 
>
> Getting a lab test result of this type using an instrument designed to do 
> ANSI/ASTM D3172 tests http://www.marsap.com/anamedinstru.com/coal.shtml  and 
> turning it into a ‘standard’ analysis is quite messy and I have a spreadsheet 
> for doing that if you need it. It was necessary for the Asian Dev Bank (which 
> built the SEET Lab) to do this because all that is available is standard coal 
> analyses, but the HTP test method is more scientific in the sense that it 
> uses the chemical composition of the fuel, not an approximation of it.  It is 
> also necessary to get the ‘as received, ash-free’ heat content. Coal analysis 
> methods gives AR (as received moisture), AD (after drying but not ‘actually 
> dry’) and FC (fixed carbon, but not ‘actual carbon’ content). It also view 
> some of the moisture as ‘inherent’. 
>
> There are two things which come back ‘wrong’: the moisture content and the 
> carbon content. Finding out what the carbon content of the volatiles was is 
> nearly impossible. The right approach is XRD and XRF. 
>
> To give you an idea of how far wrong the method is for determining Carbon, 
> here is a standard test result of some coals and sawdust briquette. It is 
> well known that the sawdust contains about 50% Carbon. It was rated as having 
> 16% ‘fixed carbon’. In other words it is basically a useless measurement when 
> it comes to biochar (or anything else). 
>
> Regards 
>
> Crispin

_______________________________________________ 

Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 

[email protected] 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 

http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site: 

http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 

   

   

Links:
------
[1] http://www.biocharlab
[2] http://www.drtlud.com


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to