Dear Michael and All

 

>Interesting discussion it is surprising how wide spread around the world the 
>support for decentralization is even with

its problems warts and whiskers. 

 

It is not generally known by New Dawn Engineering has for many years been 
looking into this problem and working out ways to manufacture locally using a 
carefully chosen blend of inputs that takes advantage of the production 
capacity and accuracy of the modern manufacturing systems (read: cent5ralised) 
and the local production of something that the customers can gain an additional 
advantage from. 

 

The idea is the put big manufacturing in its proper place in the manufacturing 
chain, and also to put the one making that ‘last mile’ connection in the value 
chain.

 

People talk about ‘making something locally’ but no one makes their own steel 
sheets, or their bolts and pop-rivets. One might substitute handmade rivets 
such is done in the Sahel where nails are cut short and used as a steel rivet, 
but that is not common. The point is that there is really no such thing as a 
metal product ‘locally made’ any more. 

 

Ceramics is another matter. It is possible to decentralised the production of 
ceramics but several new problems arise that are best controlled in a large 
facility. The bridge to be built is the connection from a simple decentralised 
facility to a central laboratory which can monitor the mix and the production 
firing. Moulding clay products consistently is easy – there have been systems 
available for lifetimes. Yes, people don’t use them, but they could. 

 

To get a ‘certifiable’ performance is the challenge. The reason is there are 
subsidies involved and in order to warranty performance, the product has to be 
consistent.

 

Jigging and tooling are key to producing a certified product locally. The 
development of producing (labour-saving) but simultaneously labour enhancing 
tooling is not as strange as it sounds. Manual or slightly mechanised 
production of the final assembly is the right idea.

 

A good example of this is the Berkeley stove in Darfur and on a smaller scale, 
the Vesto in the Gambia. Both are certifiable products in that they all have 
identical performance but both are assembled ‘on the ground’ meaning nearby the 
point of use.

 

The production of certified stoves in Senegal would include the Mayon Turbo 
Stove which is made from scrap metal in a ‘sort of certified workshop’ meaning 
they produce a consistent product. 

 

Anything made of metal can be produced more cost efficiently if the transport 
of empty space is considered. That is important in a place like Mali where all 
scrap metal is turned into stoves but there is an absolute shortage of local 
metal. If a better stove needs twice as much metal, only ½ as many can be 
produced when the material runs out. 

 

Thus importation of material is a minimum if you want to roll out at scale. If 
that material is pre-manufactured flat parts, so much the better. That is how 
to create a high performance product with local low skill labour. 

 

Regards

Crispin

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to