> The ban isn't intended to stop smokers from indulging
> their habits. It's intended to protect non-smokers in
> public places.
Is this really true? If so, then why, as evidence we need a ban, have people
touted a reduction in smokers in NYC since their ban went into effect? Why all
the data on how bad smoking is, not for the recipient of 2nd hand smoke but for
smokers? Why are groups like MPAAT funding campaigns to get smoking bans
passed when they are to be dealing with smoking cessation?
John Harris
camden
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com
_____________________________________________
To Join: St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
Archive Address:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
