I want to debate press bias as evidenced by the treatment of Palin compared to other candidates in this presidential race and other. You want to debate Palin's qualifications. You also refuse to answer simple questions regarding specific examples of press editing to change the character of Palin's position on foreign policy.
Fuck you and the Anne Kilkenny letter you swallowed whole. You're a huge waste of time, too. I sure hope Zogby is right because that may cause the press to look inward and evaluate their performance. But, rather than attribute an eventual Obama loss to obvious and widespread press bias, I suspect you'll be one of the first to claim Americans are too racist to elect a man with purple lips. On Sep 26, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Mugsy Lunsford wrote: > > At 2:30 PM -0700 9/26/08, Francis Drouillard said: >> You know what? The gang of assholes on this list that refuse to >> acknowledge > > there you go with that 'refuse to acknowledge' line again - are you > capable of actually forming an opinioni for yourself? This constant > parroting of Rush's daily talking points is really lame. > >> Palin has been scrutinized more than any other VP > > Absolutely not - that's a fantasy and a blatant lie, which you'd be > aware of if you'd do the smallest shred of research for yourself - > but that's par for the course, since you do not read any of the links > offered to you by anyone on this list, including myself, the last > time I tried to discuss this with you. A complete waste of my time > and energy, in retrospect. > >> candidate -- let alone Obama himself -- can go fuck yourselves. > > In fact, thank you, I'm now reminded why I didn't bother to respond > to your last reply to me - you clearly have not read nor retained any > of those debating points you so gleefully pointed out recently. > Regardless of what anyone says to you, you continue to 'refuse to > acknowledge' that there could be valid reasons why so many of this > "gang of assholes" are concerned about who Palin is and what exactly > she stands for - some of us actually expect our leaders to be capable > of leading. Some of us are trying to educate ourselves so that we can > vote intelligently, instead of treating the political campaign for > the highest office in our country like it was a sporting event. > Shame on you, for yet again insulting everyone here with your foul > language, and you owe Ian another apology. > >> Apparently, because she isn't on your ticket, or because you oppose >> her politically, you're willing to tolerate press bias when you think >> it helps your cause. >> >> I couldn't think less of any of you than I do right now. > > right back atcha babe, in spades. > > Oh, and you're in my kill file, so don't bother replying unless you > have read this entire exchange to your wife and listened carefully to > her response first, and then asked her what the subject line should > be, HTHBIDGAFF > > -- > Mugsy<http://www.macgeekofdogtown.com>"New York is alright, if > you like saxophones." - Fear from The Record > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
