On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Michael Luscombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > On 23-Oct-08, at 5:38 PM, Ian Sutherland wrote: > > > Actually, it speaks to our culture's treatment of women. Women in > > public life can't just go down to Kuppenheimer or Jos A. Bank and > > buy a suit off the rack and be acceptable. It's a no-win; had she > > gotten her campaign clothes at Dress-For-Less, the press would be > > all over how crappy she dressed. I don't care if there's an R or a > > D behind your name, there's (yet another) double standard here. > > > > That and she had no warm weather clothes for all the time she's > > spending in Florida <G> > > > > i > -- > > I have to disagree. > > I think they could have popped over to Macy's and dressed her sharply > for less than $150,000. > > In the current climate, with stories about how much AIG spends on > lunches and company retreats, someone should have seen that kind of > outlay as bad press before it happened. > > More than that, though, she's billing herself as an everyday working > mom. Dressing sensibly would have been more on-message, and she would > have been forgiven for not looking like Liz Taylor. Engaging in > conspicuous consumption while trying to look fiscally conscious is a > mis-step. > > Political agendas aside, someone isn't really doing their job over at > McCain HQ. Republicans are being poorly marketed this time around, > regardless of the issues. > > Michael >
So - the Pat Nixon approach ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/StrataList-OT?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
