Your form beans should be serializable if you are keeping them in session scope. I am not familiar with scaffoldingLib but AFAIK the straight struts ActionForm and derivatives all serialize OK. Obviously, everything you throw in an ActionForm must be serializable as well. There are a few classes in the jdk which are not serializable, each of which is listed in the javadoc.
Hope that helps Edgar > -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic Cekvenich > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 5:03 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: forms tag ? serialaizable > > > AFAIK we can't specify the "type of class" that the form bean > is in, in > struts config. (not formbean, but <form-beans >) > > For example, <form-beans type= "myserilazableformbeanbase" > > > This would allow me to implement session fail over of session beans. > > AFAIK, this was depercated in 1.1. > Yes, this can be miss-used but.... > > So can someone educate me that this works, else it's a > feature request. > > Easy way to test is to add this to resin, for example: > <session-config> > <file-store>WEB-INF/session</file-store> > </session-config> > > This give me exception that formbean is not seriazable > (concreate class > is, ie <form-bean name="userBean" > type="org.apache.scaffoldingLib.beans.UserBean"/> is, but the > base class > is not. This is true of Collections as well) > > tia, > Vic > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
