I have two questions for those using XP. 1) How is a programmers performance evaluated within the XP pair programming model? When dealing with humans you will occasionally end up someone that is simply not measuring up.(everyone on this list excluded of course ;-). The HR department will want some kind of documentation prior to terminating someones employement.
2) It appears that XP is applied to new development efforts (at least that is all I hear about). How is ongoing software maintanence addressed? Are bugs that can not wait for the next version addressed in the traditional model? Kenneth. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
