On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:37:34AM +0200, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote: > Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote: > >Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >>>Henrik, would that be equally cool? > >>>The divelist space will likely allow us to list stop time and transition > >>>time separately... > > > >Definitely cool. I even think I suggested that in the days of yore, which > >makes it *seriously* cool. > > ... which made me search the archives. Seriously, I need to get some sleep > now. :)
I was wondering about that :-) > http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2013-June/006800.html Insightful post... from almost exactly a year ago. I think we've come a LONG way since then. But I'd still argue to not do a separate window (because we are reusing the profile and having two windows makes this awkward). Instead let's replace the dive list and the globe with more space for the planner where we can show more data and generally provide more space. Here's my suggestion what different pieces of information we could put where: I could see the "settings" style things in the place where we currently have the globe (below the profile); that would be - start time (that should be absolute, not relative) - GF low/high (let's make this a single text field where people enter the comming "30/70" or something along those lines - Surface pressure - salt / freshwater checkbox - last stop at 6m checkbox - SAC rates at depth and during deco - Ascent speed at depth and between deco stops Then the Maintab area (to the left of the profile) would hold the cylinders and the user entered waypoints And the dive list area would hold the complete dive plan, clearly showing stop times and transition times. Other suggestions? Ideas? Counterproposals? > G'night Good Night. And thanks for your help. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
