Am 01.06.2014 17:00, schrieb Dirk Hohndel: > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 04:25:22PM +0200, Giuseppe `ferdy` Miceli wrote: >> On 01 Jun 2014, at 16:11, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> A minimalistic table would look something loke this. >>> Showing only depth and time/action. >>> There really is no point in showing ascent speeds/transition times. >>> >>> Depth Time >>> 40m 30min >>> 21m EAN50 >>> 12m 1min >>> 9m 2min >>> 6m 2min >>> 3m 6min >> >> in my humble opinion, time should be runtime and you should have listed also >> mixed gas used, e.g. : >> >> Depth Runtime Gas >> ———————————— >> 40mt 30’ TX2135 >> 21mt 33’30” EAN50 >> 18mt 35’ EAN50 >> 15mt 37’30” EAN50 >> 12mt 40’ EAN50 >> 9mt 45’ EAN50 >> 6mt 55’ Oxygen >> surface 61’ Oxygen >> >> Runtime tells to you the exact moment you are supposed to leave the depth. >> I usually print out or copy a table like this and take it with me. > > And this is what I said a couple of days ago. > This is highly personal - I don't think there's a single table we can come > up with that everyone will like. Yet on the flip side I shudder when I > think about all the configuration options it might take to cover even the > most popular ones. And then of course all this needs to be tested.
what about a template based output? where everyone can easily change the template like "\D \T \G \R" for "Depth Time Gas Runtime" or "\D \R" for only "Depth Runtime" if needed we can also have some formating options in the end everyone can adjust the output without a complicated configuration interface /martin _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
