On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 04:25:22PM +0200, Giuseppe `ferdy` Miceli wrote: > On 01 Jun 2014, at 16:11, Joakim Bygdell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A minimalistic table would look something loke this. > > Showing only depth and time/action. > > There really is no point in showing ascent speeds/transition times. > > > > Depth Time > > 40m 30min > > 21m EAN50 > > 12m 1min > > 9m 2min > > 6m 2min > > 3m 6min > > in my humble opinion, time should be runtime and you should have listed also > mixed gas used, e.g. : > > Depth Runtime Gas > ———————————— > 40mt 30’ TX2135 > 21mt 33’30” EAN50 > 18mt 35’ EAN50 > 15mt 37’30” EAN50 > 12mt 40’ EAN50 > 9mt 45’ EAN50 > 6mt 55’ Oxygen > surface 61’ Oxygen > > Runtime tells to you the exact moment you are supposed to leave the depth. > I usually print out or copy a table like this and take it with me.
And this is what I said a couple of days ago. This is highly personal - I don't think there's a single table we can come up with that everyone will like. Yet on the flip side I shudder when I think about all the configuration options it might take to cover even the most popular ones. And then of course all this needs to be tested. :-( /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
