On Sunday, 6 August 2017 00:07:30 PDT Dirk Hohndel wrote: > While I don't even pretend to be a security expert, this is a topic that I > have quite some familiarity with. Yes, right now OpenSSL 1.0.2 (latest) is > still considered "as secure" as 1.1.0 latest. I can understand the Qt team > delaying this migration for 5.10 as it is quite painful.
There's also a licensing component here. One cannot distribute GPLv2-only software linking to OpenSSL 1.1. Subsurface is GPLv2-only, isn't it? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
