Re: CNS calculation headaches

Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:41:17 -0700

Willem,

On 10. Aug 2019, at 15:19, Robert Helling <[email protected]> wrote:

PS: The original problem arose as the interpolated table value is used in the denominator of the cns += formula and would result in a pole when the extrapolated table value reaches 0. Maybe we should redo the whole thing and linearly interpolate the inverses of the table value rather than the table value. For those an extrapolation would be more sensible.

here is another idea: With the exception of the values above pO2 of 1.5bar, a power law is actually a pretty good fit to the table:

Attachment: PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


This is exp(11.7853 - 0.00193873 pO2).

Maybe, we should give up the idea of the table entirely and use this power law instead?

Best
Robert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Reply via email to