On 2019/08/10 15:40, Robert Helling wrote:
Willem,
On 10. Aug 2019, at 15:19, Robert Helling <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
PS: The original problem arose as the interpolated table value is
used in the denominator of the cns += formula and would result in a
pole when the extrapolated table value reaches 0. Maybe we should
redo the whole thing and linearly interpolate the inverses of the
table value rather than the table value. For those an extrapolation
would be more sensible.
here is another idea: With the exception of the values above pO2 of
1.5bar, a power law is actually a pretty good fit to the table:
This is exp(11.7853 - 0.00193873 pO2).
Maybe, we should give up the idea of the table entirely and use this
power law instead?
Best
Robert
An interesting alternative, Robert. I am not happy with the deviation at
1.5 and 1.6. One would have to check what the effect of these two points
are on the power curve. What is the effect on the overall fit of the
power curve if one omits those two points? What of a 3rd order
polynomial that could in principle accommodate the inflection at 1.4? I
am not averse to a mathematical solution because the linear
interpolation also causes some inaccuracy.
And of course I like your graph because it is the right way round with
time limit being the dependent variable. Baker's graph is the wrong way
round.
I would also love to see what it will look like if one interpolates on
inverses. But it does not in principle avoid the problem at pO2=1.65.
With respect to your idea of NOT calculating CNS when pO2 > 1.65, if I
understand you correctly, the underestimate will be much higher if those
points on the dive profile do not contribute to the total CNS toxicity.
I think in the planner the solution is to incorporate whatever mechanism
appears prudent and simply add a warning to the dive plan that the CNS
value cannot be trusted because of the high pO2. In the dive log it is a
different thing since the dive log has no way of adding system warnings
except for the red banner at the bottom of the screen. I am not sure
that a user would like to get past a red banner warning every time
she/he views that dive.
Kind regards,
willem
--
This message and attachments are subject to a disclaimer.
Please refer to
http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf
<http://upnet.up.ac.za/services/it/documentation/docs/004167.pdf> for
full
details.
_______________________________________________
subsurface mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
