On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, > distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also > introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a > clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names > or other names.
Excellent, we really needed this. My only (minor) concern is that so many codenames might confuse casual observers or contributors. What about using some composited terms instead of a single chemical one? For example, instead of Sucrose, demonstration package? Thanks Benjamin, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar