On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important,
> distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also
> introduce cutesy codenames.  I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a
> clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names
> or other names.

Excellent, we really needed this. My only (minor) concern is that so
many codenames might confuse casual observers or contributors.

What about using some composited terms instead of a single chemical one?

For example, instead of Sucrose, demonstration package?

Thanks Benjamin,

Sugar mailing list

Reply via email to