Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, >> distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also >> introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a >> clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names >> or other names. >> > > Excellent, we really needed this. My only (minor) concern is that so > many codenames might confuse casual observers or contributors. > > What about using some composited terms instead of a single chemical one? > > For example, instead of Sucrose, demonstration package? > > Thanks Benjamin, > > Tomeu > I don't find this taxonomy confusing and I think it's a great way to distinguish the components.
Keeps with FOSS traditions too :-) _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
