On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, >> distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also >> introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a >> clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names >> or other names. > > Excellent, we really needed this. My only (minor) concern is that so > many codenames might confuse casual observers or contributors. > > What about using some composited terms instead of a single chemical one? > > For example, instead of Sucrose, demonstration package?
Let's talk about a concrete case. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Roadmap Changes I'd make to use Ben taxonomy: * In the schedule section s/Sugar/Sucrose * Split the moduleset section in Glucose moduleset and Fructose moduleset. * In the tickets session s/Sugar core/Fructose. Or perhaps two items, Glucose tickets and Fructose tickets. How does it sound? Alternative proposals? Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
