On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sort of. Mostly, I'm not sure I understand your intended release > timeline, so I didn't want to touch it. > > I think s/Sugar/Sucrose/ is probably a good choice here. However, I also > view a Sucrose release as little more than a pair of pointers, to a > specific version of Glucose and a specific version of Fructose. So for > example, declaring a "feature freeze" on Sucrose seems slightly weird, > because Sucrose doesn't really have any features of its own. This is not > an important point, but since I was not 100% sure what to do, I did nothing.
For 0.82, I'm planning to use a single schedule for Glucose/Fructose for simplicity (we can reevalute for the next release). So I think using Fructose on the schedule make sense. I went ahead and made the change. Marco _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
