Andrew, Many thanks for that response.  It certainly will be worth getting
this colleague to look more closely in case there is some further text - or
even if any text has not yet been noticed.  I would certainly appreciate
your getting in touch with your Classics man.  That would be wonderful.  

I am amazed and delighted with the response to this and am equally amazed
at how difficult it is proving.  I never thought this would be so
interesting.

Re your PS:  The dial at Stratfield Saye has only recently been spotted (by
Peter Ransom) but the photograph of the dial plate is really rather
difficult to read!  If yours is reasonable then I would be delighted to
receive a report in due course. Don't worry at any delay caused by waiting
for your film to be finished the dial entries are logged by date seen not
by date received (or entered!) by me.

I have sent you a .pcx version of the Report form to your own e-mail
address for reference. You may have to print it at 51% of stored size - at
least that's what I have to do to get a near A4 print. If you do have more
to add please do send one in.

Regards and thanks again.

Patrick

Reply via email to