----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr. D. Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

<snip>.
> If anyone wants to visit one of our layouts in a public location, and then
> 'reverse engineer' it - I am perfectly happy for them to do so.
</snip>

Oooh, there's nothing like a challenge! Unfortunately, in spite of their
apparent common-ness, I have never come across any of these dials in Nova
Scotia. Luckily, some pictures can be found on the web, at Mr. Hunt's
website. Take a look at the example of one from a school in the USA. The
direct URL is http://www.argonet.co.uk/education/sunclocks/pics/fs-015.htm
It looks like a close copy of the design in Waugh.

By my estimate, from the spacing of the hour marks, the smiling girl is
sitting right over the East marker. Connect her bum to the West marker and
you have the EW axis of the dial. Note that the declination scale is made of
bricks which I assume to be of equal width and equally spaced. I reckon
there are 11 to the North and 14 to the South of the EW axis.

So either the dial is badly laid out, or the upper part is deliberately
shortened - which is consistent with having a smaller inner ellipse for the
summer hours. By the way, 11/14 is close to 3/4, which is my estimate of the
ratio of the sizes of the two rings, based on the relative radii of matching
pairs of hour points.

Paint the inner summer ring in a nice warm red, and likewise for the
corresponding part of the declination scale. Paint the outer winter ring in
a icy cool blue, along with its part of the scale, and you have a intuitive
way to know which ring to read from. Only thing is, in the example they used
black and blue so its not particularly intuitive, but at least they thought
to distinguish them.

The problem with this "re-sizing" approach is that the start and finish of
Daylight saving time don't coincide with the equinox. During October, the
user would be on the 'big' declination scale but reading the time from the
inner ring. How would the design cater for that? My guess is that it
doesn't. I suspect the resultant error would be relatively small and would
be swamped by the error from user not standing in the exact place for the
day, EoT etc., and the claim is only for 15 minute accuracy anyway.

Anyone care to improve on my analysis?

The bit I don't have an answer for is "why bother?". Why not simply have a
small hour mark, double labelled, and read one label set in summer and the
other in winter based on colour coding, or typeface or any other
distinguishing property you can think of?

Steve

-

Reply via email to