"Jared B. Reimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone tried the final 3.0 release across low latency, medium > bandwidth WAN links (e.g. DSL) yet? I tried the 3.0 beta with > 300-500 kbit/sec bandwidth, and was rather disappointed with the > performance. It was usable, but not something I'd want to use > every day. Did things change materially between the beta and the > final release?
A couple of bugs have been found and fixed in this area since the beta (one that springs to mind is that the connection could get clamped into a high-compression mode when a less-compressed higher-throughput mode would have been appropriate) but nothing fundamental has changed between then and now. If you happened to run into one of those bugs then the FCS experience might be better but it probably won't be wildly better. What desktop, what applications and what kinds of traffic were you running over the DSL? Did you capture any packet loss or latency numbers? OttoM. __ ottomeister Disclaimer: These are my opinions. I do not speak for my employer. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm _______________________________________________ SunRay-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
