What are the problems with Linux NFS? I am running a cluster of mail
servers on a NetApp filer
on 2.6 kernel without any issues so far. It's not too busy at the moment
(well, that's why it's a cluster!)
--
Leigh
Dave McGuire wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The two things that are preventing us to move to LINUX is full
functionality. (non-smart card sessions, etc.)
The other and more important is the complete lack of stability in
the NFS kernel. We fight with the every day.
If Sun could work on replacing the NFS kernel so it works like it
does on solaris, that would be a big help. ;-)
Thanks,
-steve
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
I think it's great that Sun is supportive of Linux, but I don't think
they should have to rewrite big chunks of it (like NFS).
Well, if Linux's NFS support was worth a damn, there'd be no
motivation to replace it.
There are some parts of Linux that need serious help from "adult"
software developers, and the Linux community would do well to accept
that help from anyone willing to supply it...especially Sun where NFS
is concerned, as they developed it in the first place.
-Dave
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
