On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:50:52 -0700
ottomeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Meik Hellmund
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  So I will try a Nevada+SRSS installation. Any known traps?
> 
> There are no known issues with SRSS on Nevada at present.
> 
> However, Nevada is in active development and things do get
> broken from time to time.  For instance, build 85 is very broken
> on x86 so it wouldn't be suitable as a "Community Edition"
> download.  This is internal breakage, independent of SRSS.
> 
> This is why Live Upgrade is a good strategy to use with
> Nevada.  It lets you try a new version without destroying the
> previous one, so that if the new version doesn't work on your
> system you can easily revert to the earlier one.

I made a live upgrade from Solaris 10 to Nevada build 84 and it went 
really smooth. Live upgrade automatically preserved most of the configuration
(including all of the SunRay stuff). I had to reconfigure ldapclient
but the rest was fine.
There was one small problem with the Windows connector: Nevada provides 
libcrypto.so.0.9.8, and uttsc wants libcrypto.so.0.9.7, so I  installed 
the Blastwave package.
 
Now I have a Gnome which looks much better than JDS or blastwave's gnome. 
Does anyone know where to get a recent KDE-3 (i.e., 3.5.7 .. 3.5.9) 
for Solaris/x86?  


-- 
Meik Hellmund
Mathematisches Institut, Uni Leipzig
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users

Reply via email to