12.02.2020, 22:54, "Colin Booth" <co...@heliocat.net>: > I wasn't trying to be hostile, apologies if it came across that way. As > far as I know SIGPWR is a Linux-specific signal so services that are > aiming for portability will either need to have special handling for > that in the linux case or need to ignore it. Ergo, runit (and all other > POSIX-compliant inits) currently have no special handling around SIGPWR > as they don't understand what it is.
what should SIGPWR mean to a Linux init ? i would suggest: halt and power down the system ASAP.
