> > does that mean there are plans to fix and revive that code for current > models? or not? >
No special plans - I just tried to preserve that code through the updates, did not remove it. > to be honest it seems to me this was implemented to showcase a application > (or specific request) and never got used any further by anyone. > Yes, you are right - that was something I've spent a week hoping it can help make other applications. But nobody used it as far as I know. > > I am unable to do necessary FPGA coding myself, but I would be willing to > document its usage and or maybe build a frontend for it if necessary > (actually it was poorly documented and it took me long time to figure out > how to use it since you do not just set the camera into linescan mode, you > have to make some explicit choices and settings otherwise you get the > impression it just does not work or crash...) > Michael, most likely (but I'm not 100% positive) the FPGA code does not need any changes, just the software. And unfortunately we do not have sufficient resources to do that job. I can only offer some help by answering particular questions related to that code, not to do the actual coding. > > I am aware thought that this is a probably commercially pretty > uninteresting niche application. but I think it is a worth to have in a > general purpose camera (as I come to see the elphe line) and still might be > an affordable alternative to dedicated line-scan systems in some areas.. > > I hoped it can be used in photo-finish applications - less pricey that dedicated systems. We may partially sponsor such project, but not organize it. Andrey
_______________________________________________ Support-list mailing list [email protected] http://support.elphel.com/mailman/listinfo/support-list_support.elphel.com
