On 11/01/2009 04:12 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > NoOp: >>On 10/31/2009 07:13 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote: > >>> I have already given the time frame. First the problem could be avoided >>> by backing out 'Patch, version 1.1' from >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311774. >>> <[email protected]>. >> >>Ok I give, what specifically is: <[email protected]> ? > > Don't understand the question. Are you asking about, what a MID is? Or > for the content of posting to which the MID is pointing?
The Message ID: <[email protected]> I don't use google groups et al; nor do many others. > > Well, using the MIDF Obviously you are not from Malaysia :-) http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/MIDF > on the MID one can get the Posting e.g. in Goggle. > http://groups.google.com/group/de.comm.software.mozilla.nightly-builds/msg/159965120a124f64 Blah - it's Message-ID (according to the header), as in Message-ID: <[email protected]> The link works, but it's really a post on news://de.comm.software.mozilla.nightly-builds/ and why assume anyone uses google group eh? > > The MIDF is one of two add-ons i cannot live without. The other one is > Mnenhy. *g* Never used Mnenhy. But simply posting a 'Message-ID' in a bug report probably isn't going to get much mileage. My suggestion would be to be less lazy (:-)) and: 1) post a link to the msg as you've done above, and/or 2) just post what you are talking about. For others interested; here is the english translation (provided by google) of Harmut's post with some snippage: <http://groups.google.com/group/de.comm.software.mozilla.nightly-builds/msg/159965120a124f64> <quote> ... Hartmut Figge View profile Translate to English Translated (View Original) Hartmut Figge: > Alfred Peters >> Through Check-Out confirmed: >> Yes, the patch is to blame! 'You're so terribly active. I hope that I succeed in my > conscience to keep in check. It is not. There was such an insidious gnawing constantly in the background because of suspicious matches. Sigh. So, after this patch Kick out the problem with that is CPU load removed. Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Of users for user :-) Hide options Sep 28, 7:56 am Newsgroups: de.comm.software.mozilla.nightly-builds From: Hartmut Figge <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:56:02 +0200 Local: Mon, Sep 28 2009 7:56 am Subject: Re: Leeres Artikelfenster durch Aktualisierung Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author Hartmut Figge: > Alfred Peters >> Through Check-Out confirmed: >> Yes, the patch is to blame! 'You're so terribly active. I hope that I succeed in my > conscience to keep in check. It is not. There was such an insidious gnawing constantly in the background because of suspicious matches. Sigh. So, after this patch Kick out the problem with that is CPU load removed. Hartmut -- Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/ Of users for user :-) </quote> And after all of that, I'm not sure that I understand anything :-) _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
