On 1/6/2010 1:26 PM, chicagofan wrote: > Mark Hansen wrote: >> >> It sounded to me like they wanted to cancel their post. This is ultimately >> a function of the news server. The user can demand the feature in their >> news client all they want, but if the server doesn't provide the feature, >> it's not going to work. I'm not aware of any public news server which >> provide this feature. > > > Agreed, but what is the difference they see or advantage to using Forte > over SM? I don't see it, at least related to what was mentioned.
I can't answer that. I don't use Forte. >> Well, that's a new one on me :) The UI simply says Go -> Next -> Unread >> Thread. It doesn't say anything about marking the current thread "read", >> but sure enough, that's what it appears to do. >> >> Thanks, > > > LOL... you scared me for a minute, so I had to rush to test it and make > sure it still worked that way. :) Especially since, I just got 2.0.2 > this morning. Happy to say it still does for me too. > bj > Sorry to scare you :) No fright intended. It seems strange to me that an action titled "Next unread thread" should have the side effect of marking the current thread as read. I can see that it is very convenient, it just doesn't make sense to me. Best Regards, _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
