Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-22 12:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 10-02-21 8:32 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Is this a joke?

Of course not. :-) I don't think you believe that all users have the
same opinion on every feature.

Well, I'm with Bill on this one. The crippled form manager is a major
reason why I'm still hesitating to "upgrade."

And the developers here have told me to shut up or write my own code,
and that's not an option. I'm not a programmer, so I can't solve the
problem.

* That's not the point. Just because someone disagrees with you about a feature, doesn't mean they're joking.

* Could you please link me to where you were told to shut up? From all the threads I've read here, the response to complaints about the forms manager has been: -- The Form manager in the shared Mozilla codebase is what is there now, so continuing to use the old for form manager requires coding the is specific to SeaMonkey. -- There was not enough resources to code the SeaMonkey form manager in 2.0, but we'd on getting it in the next major release.
-- Help coding it would be appreciated.

I have the same feeling about at least part of what he said, noting that he paraphrased and gave a synopsis. I believe someone posted that SM was now using the shared code base and we were stuck with whatever the FF developers chose to give us. I believe the actual phrase was more like "complaining won't make them do anything about it," but I read that as "shut up and go away" too.

--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to