On 07/31/2011 03:51 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 20:29:01 -0400, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>JohnW-Mpls wrote: >> >>> Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites >>> - 2.2's new option to "advertise FireFox compatibility" does not >>> help, at least for me. One of my major sites is adding stuff SM >>> just does not see and I cannot afford to miss those things. >> >>Why don't you try the User Agent Switcher and spoof with a full >>Firefox UA string? > > I just now tried getting User Agent Switcher and it came back saying it is > not compatible with SM 2.2. >
You've still not provided a link to an example url. Again; it doesn't do much good to complain unless you provide a link so that others can test. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
