JohnW-Mpls sent me the following::
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:44:24 -0700, sean nathan bean
<[email protected]> wrote:
JohnW-Mpls sent me the following::
Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's
new option to "advertise FireFox compatibility" does not help, at least for
me. One of my major sites is adding stuff SM just does not see and I
cannot afford to miss those things.
So, I'm switching my browser work to FireFox - hate to leave good old SM -
and I now need to re-establish all my passwords. I'm also a little
concerned about all the talk about fancy FF add-ins - I doubt I want any but
I dislike being bothered by someone interrupting me to tout some new
capability.
I'll keep using SM for the mail and address book - the best arrangement I've
seen (supposedly equaled only by the old Eudora). One remaining problem in
SM Mail is the inability to automatically delete old messages in more than
just my first account - I'd like the same service in at least six more
accounts. Or am I missing some setting or option?
some links to sites that still block you would be helpful indeed...
sean
My current problem is not SM being blocked from a password protected bank
site, but that some graphics inside an open site cannot be seen using SM.
One URL is<http://pastortania.posterous.com/> - the photos with the blog
are not seen with SM 2.2. I got to that URL via my church's site
<http://westwoodlutheran.org/content.cfm?id=151>. Also, my church's site is
the one that does not accept SM 2.2 for my uploads of files - need to use
FF,IE,...
--
JohnW-Mpls
i also see photos... using SM 2.2 in peppermintOS Two linux...
--
Natural foods can be harmful...
... Look at all the people who die of natural causes.
courtesy of TagZilla 0.066.2
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
