On 08/01/2011 02:23 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:44:24 -0700, sean nathan bean > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>JohnW-Mpls sent me the following:: >>> >>> Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's >>> new option to "advertise FireFox compatibility" does not help, at least for >>> me. One of my major sites is adding stuff SM just does not see and I >>> cannot afford to miss those things. >>> >>> So, I'm switching my browser work to FireFox - hate to leave good old SM - >>> and I now need to re-establish all my passwords. I'm also a little >>> concerned about all the talk about fancy FF add-ins - I doubt I want any but >>> I dislike being bothered by someone interrupting me to tout some new >>> capability. >>> >>> I'll keep using SM for the mail and address book - the best arrangement I've >>> seen (supposedly equaled only by the old Eudora). One remaining problem in >>> SM Mail is the inability to automatically delete old messages in more than >>> just my first account - I'd like the same service in at least six more >>> accounts. Or am I missing some setting or option? >>> >> >>some links to sites that still block you would be helpful indeed... >> >>sean > > My current problem is not SM being blocked from a password protected bank > site, but that some graphics inside an open site cannot be seen using SM. > > One URL is <http://pastortania.posterous.com/> - the photos with the blog > are not seen with SM 2.2. ...
Works for me with both SM 2.2 and 2.3. I tested in both linux and Windows. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
