Bzzz wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500
Chris Ilias<n...@ilias.ca> wrote:
I don't know what you mean by "became bloat". If you're having problems
Yes, I didn't used the right expression.
For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such
a site is opened (http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php),
it took almost 6 seconds to switch from claws-mail to this window
and the site goes up to 100% CPU (Athlon-XP1600+) for 6 more seconds.
Seamonkey 2.7.1; Win/7 32-bit running as a VM inside Win/7 64-bit, with
Server 2003 running as another VM at the same time. Seven seconds (or
thereabouts) to complete the display, CPU never more than 60%, and
typically no more than 5% to 10%. Intel i7 2.6GHz, 3440Mb allocated
to each VM.
Personally speaking, performance is not an issue for me; I didn't
choose Seamonkey because it was the fastest kid on the block,
I chose it because it offered what I looked for in terms of
browser and IMAP integration, and in look and feel. It still
offers what I want in terms of browser and IMAP integration,
but the look and feel is nowhere near as attractive as it
once was. I /really/ don't need a new tool bar to pop-up
just because I press Ctrl-F, nor do I want it to start searching
until I tell it to. And tabs are the spawn of the devil.
Philip Taylor
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
