On 02/14/2012 01:14 PM, Bzzz wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:44:43 -0500 > Chris Ilias <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I don't know what you mean by "became bloat". If you're having problems > > Yes, I didn't used the right expression. > For example, to answer your post I selected the SM window where such > a site is opened (http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php), > it took almost 6 seconds to switch from claws-mail to this window > and the site goes up to 100% CPU (Athlon-XP1600+) for 6 more seconds. > > W/ the former SM version, it didn't take ANY cpu raise and the switch > took less than a second (and non, I'm not swapping: 900MB free RAM)
You probably should file a bug with your distro. In a comparison of Opera & SM 2.7.1 in opening <http://television.telerama.fr/tele/grille.php> the result are the same: 13 seconds (from a low speed California US connection). Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61 Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1 Your X-Mailer identifier is: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) so no idea what your actual SeaMonkey build is. > >> with specific pages, could you tell us which pages and specifically what >> the problems are? Most folks in here are willing to help. > >> It might be a little tougher than usual, because you're using Iceape. I >> don't know what other changes Debian made other than rebranding. > > Debian only uses another name because of a non-free policy (touching > the logo if I remember well); but the code's exactly the same > otherwise. That's an issue that you need to sort out with your disto. It could very well be that your distro version has issues - file a bug report with them. Come back when you've installed and tested the versions from: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#2.7.1 ... > > All this story reminds me exactly the gnome3 phenomena: they changed > all! shortcuts, display, windows places, etc and they don't take any > criticism (even the constructive ones) in account. And this is relevant here why? > > This is what gets me mad and why I'm gonna uninstall SM ASA p/w will > be extracted for further restore in a product that don't take users > for dummies. > SM is following *exactly* the same scheme as certain sites that > change their terms, indicating that from now to now on your data > can be shared to whatever commercial partner... without me! I suspect that your distro versions have been so poorly maintained that you are just now catching up with the changes from SeaMonkey 1.x to 2.7.x. Excuse me... that should be 'Iceape' instead of SeaMonkey. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
